p2p addict

Registration Date: 28-08-2018 Date of Birth: Not Specified Local Time: 21-09-2021 at 10:57 PM Status: (Hidden)

p2p addict's Forum Info Joined: 28-08-2018 Last Visit: (Hidden) Total Posts: 20 (0.02 posts per day | 0.1 percent of total posts) (Find All Posts) Total Threads: 0 (0 threads per day | 0 percent of total threads) Time Spent Online: (Hidden) Members Referred: 0 Total Likes Received: 21 (0.02 per day | 0.22 percent of total 9349) (Find All Threads Liked For — Find All Posts Liked For) Total Likes Given: 7 (0.01 per day | 0.07 percent of total 9352) (Find All Liked Threads — Find All Liked Posts) Additional Info About p2p addict Please select the group that best describes you: P2P Investor & Observers p2p addict's awards. This user has no awards at this time. p2p addict's Most Liked Post Post Subject Numbers of Likes RE: BridgeCrowd FCA Status - What happens if BC stops trading or becomes insolvent? 4 Thread Subject Forum Name BridgeCrowd FCA Status - What happens if BC stops trading or becomes insolvent? Discussion (BridgeCrowd) Post Message If BC are not providing A36 agreements (and hence do not need to be authorised for that), then what exactly ARE they providing? How can a loan between A & B (managed by BC) be different to a loan between A & B (managed by MT or FS for example).  Makes no sense.  SO I think the only "get-out" clause is what Louis previously stated - which is that they are not "electronically" matching A & B, as investors are self-selecting loans and there is no electronic algorithm doing it for them. However, if such is correct then why do any other self-select platforms (eg MT/FS/LY/ABL etc) need permissions??  It's about as clear as mud